According to a Washington Post article, a report, sponsored by the Hillsborough, N.C.-based Center for Teaching Quality, said teachers should be able to advance through three pay tiers -- novice, professional and expert -- and schools should stop paying teachers more just because they have more years on the job.
"If you don't have a career ladder that encourages teachers to advance in their profession -- and be paid accordingly as they advance -- tinkering around the edges by providing $2,000 bonuses for a handful of teachers will not secure the stable, high-quality professional workforce we need," the teachers said.
In particular, the group said, pay plans should "reward leadership, not seniority." It said that "qualified teachers who take on additional responsibilities -- mentoring novices and peers and preparing new teachers, creating family- and community-outreach programs, serving on advisory councils and the like -- should be paid for their time outside the classroom." And the jobs should go not to the oldest teachers but to the ones with the best classroom results, the group said.
Taking North Carolina as an example, the group suggested an annual pay scale that started at $30,000 for a novice and climbed to $70,000 for an expert. But an expert with extra school improvement responsibilities could make as much as $130,000.
The article further stated that the report endorsed the views of many expert panels that teachers should be paid more if they have better results in their classroom, but it pointed out flaws in efforts to do that. The team was critical of a Florida program that limited performance incentives to one out of every four teachers. They also said rewarding only those who teach state-tested subjects, such as reading and math, was a bad idea.
They recommended more money for teachers whose students improved significantly, as long as the results were based on more than just one variety of test. They said systems should be free to target specialties they need. "It makes no sense for an individual community to pay more for a math teacher if it actually needs more art or history teachers," the report said.
The pay scales for teachers definitely should be revamped. A teacher should not be paid more simply because he/she has more experience in the classroom. The pay should be based upon successful experience in the classroom. Certain questions should be asked and answered affirmatively. Are the students making progress in the class? Are the students meeting bench marks set by the school system? Is the teacher going that extra mile to make sure that the students are performing to their maximum potential, or is the teacher just there to collect a pay check?
At the same time, if a school system believes that they are going to get the best and brightest by offering beginning teachers a $30,000.00 salary, they are living in a fantasy world. If our top teachers are suggesting that this be a starting salary for teachers in North Carolina, that explains why they rank 21st in the estimated teachers' salary in the United States.
New teachers earn less than their peers in other professions requiring comparable education and responsibilities. Wages start low, and the gap keeps widening, causing many good teachers to leave the profession for greener financial pastures. So in conjunction with the revamping of salaries for teachers that are on board, as suggested by Hillsborough, N.C.-based Center for Teaching Quality, we clearly need to step up the salary for entry level teachers.
The Washington Post reports that about 50 students rallied outside the Maryland State House this morning, urging the Senate to pass a bill that offers in-state tuition to illegal immigrants.
Things are going too far now. It wasn't bad enough that we had to witness the humorless Snickers Bar commercial during Super Bowl showing two men's lips meeting in a kiss while eating a candy bar. There are people actually teaching about homosexuality in the elementary schools.
Poverty is not talked about much in this country, except, that is, around election time. However, the United States, the wealthiest nation in the world, has families that can't afford the basic things such as food, affordable housing, health and dental care, or childcare. According to the National Center for Children in Poverty, we have 37 million Americans living below the poverty level, and twelve million are children who live in families with incomes below the federal poverty level—which is about $16,000 for a family of three and $19,000 for a family of four. Perhaps more shocking is that 5 million children live in families with incomes of less than half the poverty level—and the numbers are rising.
Recent Comments